Sunday, November 24, 2013

OCoP: The what and how

Prior to the module, I had no clue as to what OCoP's were and their relative importance. 

 OCoP's are Online Communities of Practice.  These are communities that are developed or run online amongst individuals/ groups with common interests. These can run the gamut from educators interested in particular topics or sports fanatics. The commonality is interest within a particular topic. Examples of successful OCoP's. In essence there are hundreds of thousands of communities of practice, from beenie baby collectors to wrestling fans, now with mass access top the internet the number of OCoP's is tremendous. Success in an OCoP have certain common factors evident.


These Include

  •  High Level of interest(passion)  with regards to content/ action that members would like to interact about and improve their skills on   

  • Accessible and user friendly interface/ infrastructure
  • OCoP's provides technical support and guidance

  • Community outreaches and provides training and education

  • Provide common vision and mission and allow for

Examples of OCoP's



  • Technology Integration in Education

Essay: eLearning Theory in Distance Education



Importance of eLearning theory in Distance Education

Distance Education rapid ascent as the key adaptive component in education (has  brought) and is bringing about much discussion as to the role of eLearning theory with regards to Distance Education(DE). eLearning theory  is a key component in determining the framework for the current and future paradigm of DE. The role of theory in the development of distance education  is evidenced in the clear roles that  theories of  learning, such as behaviorist, cognitive, constructivist & Connectivist theories all have had (and will continue to have) in the development of DE.  The development of eLearning theory as a framework to address the uniqueness of the current (and future) DE environment is all encompassed in the evolving construct that  is eLearning theory (Ally, 20). It is important to understand that as DE rapidly undergoes inevitable shifts associated with advancements in technologies, there must be a stout grounding in theory to maximize the educational return for all parties involved.  eLearning Theory is serving  as a tool in providing a framework for optimally utilizing both resources and technologies that were previously nonexistent as tools in education (Dabbagh, 2005). Additionally,   theory can bridge current strategies and ideas to those novel ideas needed in the future.  Anderson evidences the following with regards to theory, “ This Broader perspective helps us make connections with the works of others, facilitates coherent frameworks and deeper understanding of our actions, and perhaps most importantly, allows us to transfer experience gained in one context to new experience and contexts” (Anderson, 45). Distance education has significantly drawn from continually developing  and adapting eLearning theory.

Roots and evolution of eLearning theory

The development of  eLearning theory encompasses various theories (Schools) of  learning, such as Behaviorist, Cognitive, Constructivist & Connectivist theories all have had (and will continue to have).  During the early stages of DE, eLearning incorporated  aspects of behaviorist learning theory (Ally, 2005).  Learning theory  transitioned to a more cognitive approach as researchers pointed that learning is more complex than simply observable changes in behavior. This shift in approach to look at learning (and eLearning specifically) as an internal process that involves many aspects including “use of memory, motivation and thinking, and that reflection plays an important part in learning.” (Ally , 2005  p.19). eLearning theory now understands the importance of Constructive thought. The importance of understanding frame of reference could be a key (whether the learner or the educator) component to creating common language and common norms within virtual community.  Lastly, Connectivist thought points to the importance of understanding the uniqueness of the current “information explosion”.  The principles behind connectivism point to the need to understand that learners must deconstruct their current information databank and must continually vet and revamp information.     

eLearning Theory current DE practice

Along with the general educational evolution that is taking place in face-to-face (f2f) institutions there has been increased discussion of the importance of an “eLearning theory” that encompasses the need of the current realities of rapid technological advances, high degree of interconnectedness as well as the continual evolution of pedagogy (specifically within the online learning community).  The implementation of behaviorist, cognitive as well constructivist and Connectivist  learning theories in eLearning theory as the following are seen as accepted tenants in DE
·      In DE setting norms and expectations must be outlined for the learner to assess their level of understanding 
·      Layering or grouping of information to prevent inundating of learner with boatloads of information
·      Allowing learners to construct knowledge “take ownership of knowledge through exploration and inquiry
The role of eLearning theory in DE practice is demonstrated through the identification of infrastructure and interaction for online learning (Anderson 2005).  This includes the identification of the multiple levels of interactions,  as well as the medium within which theses interactions occur.  eLearning theory addresses the complexities of nurturing interaction (such as student–student) that may be limited in conventional f2f learning but can be nurtured if fostered in the DE environment.  eLearning theory also addresses the temporal and spatial interrelationships that exist and quantifies the complexities of DE, and the need to have a theory to “ground” the extremely chaotic world that exists for all parties involved in the DE education process (Anderson 2005 p. 57).  eLearning theories imprints are evidenced in much of DE practice.  

Conclusion

eLearning Theory has been a  key component of DE. Without the  principles that are consistent and optimal for DE within the online context the potential for extreme chaos and frustration from all parties exist.  Many learners who are delving in the current paradigm in DE  have to make several mental shifts that take place on a daily basis. These shifts need to address the unique aspects of the DE community are and significantly different from those in the non-DE community, thus  as Anderson and others  point out the importance of having a solid elearning theory/ model of online learning/DE. The development eLearning theory grounded in a solid underpinning of social, behavioral, constructivist & Connectivist learning theory, as well as development frameworks for eLearning and online learning that address the need for a theoretical framework that can be discussed and debated is a key aspect to current DE practice.



References

Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for e-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, v1, n1, pp. 25-44.
Ally, M. (2011). Foundation of Educational Theory for Online Learning. Theory and Practice of  Online Learning (pp. 15-44). Edmonton: AU Press.
Anderson, T. (2011). Towards a Theory of Online Learning. Theory and Practice of  Online Learning (pp. 45-74). Edmonton: AU Press.

OCL/ Social Media Education Activity



One of  the challenges was to construct an activity that incorporated some aspect of  social media. Below is a link to the activity( as well as the description of the activity)

 
Planet Kibo An OCL activity
The creative potential that digital age has provided is tremendous. With the ability to literally crowd sources any and all questions or ideas the digital age has provided a level of collaboration that once seemed impossible. The potential for collaborative models in the additive (or multiplicative) potential with regards to online collaboration is evidenced in conventional clichés such as “two heads are better than one”. From the discovery of DNA through the collaboration between Watson & Crick (of course now we know also with the unknowing collaboration of Franklin)  to the creation of gaming code the potential for collaboration with regards to the furthering of knowledge has existed for reasons. The advent of the internet, as well as the streamlining of the availability of various media tools and connections really accelerated the level of collaboration. This seemingly exponential rise in interconnectivity has education and pedagogy scrambling to understand the potential for this particular collaborative model as a tool.  Thus it was argues that there needed to be a new learning theory that addressed this high level of collaboration and interconnectivity.   The internet age “emphasized pushing our mental capabilities” Online collaborative learning emphasizes the that the paradigm shift that has taken place  with regard to the creative and educational potential that the high degree of collaboration has had on  those in the net generation as well as those of who are generation(s) prior  in this digital age. Harasim points out that all have “Rather than being passive recipients of mass consumer culture, the Net Gen spends time searching, reading, scrutinizing, authenticating, collaborating and” ( Harasim, p 82) (2012-03-22).
Thus OCL accentuates the interconnected construction new learning through discussions via digital collaboration to foster a greater understanding of content and to construct new areas of  knowledge.  OCL theory can provide real world context, communication and discourse amongst many individuals across the globe and thus can foster an inquisitiveness and dialogue that may lead to a deeper understanding of content as well as proposing new lines of thought through discourse.
                        The activity I am proposing is related to the ecology component of highs school or secondary science.   The Objective would be that the students should be able to differentiate/distinguish amongst ecosystems, biomes, community’s populations and species. This involves the creation of an online flora and fauna activity that runs that gamut across classrooms in 10-20 different locations (preferably at least 5 different countries).  Each classroom would be responsible for documenting flora and fauna over 2 seasons (winter and spring).  Students would first be provided rudimentary descriptions of flora and fauna and a layout of the collection of data. Secondly the responsibilities of each site would be pointed out.  The product would be a virtual world “Planet Kibo” that has “islands” populated by the living, nonliving things as well as any other component that they would wish to incorporate.
            Technology serves as a key component for the project  We begin with the 1st step being an interconnection between 10-20 separated classrooms/ institutions through an online medium( facebook / skype….). Additionally the storage and transfer of the “data” whether they be pictures, documents, videos … would be through an online medium as well as online storage. The exchange and interaction amongst the community would  to uses social networking and other online community tools to interactively create. These would include ( but are not limited to) tech tools such as  instagramming, tweeting, vining, google driving and dropboxing .  Thus the basis for the introduction, communication as well as delivery and presentation  is all technology based. 

Activity

Planet Kibo: Fauna and Flora
Greetings . We are here to save the universe from destruction. You and 19 other Alien planets have been selected to be saved on the new Planet Kibo. Your mission should you choose it will be to create replica of your  habitat on  one part of Planet Kibo. You will accomplish this by sending images, videos, descriptions of as many things as exist in your particular flora and fauna. We will replicate these things on the using our advanced technology. You will need to document his over  two of your seasons. You will be judged on thoroughness of your environment. You may send the pictures, video and documents using any one of the following.  you will have to assess your environment in comparison to others, and determine whether the habitats are complementary. Also identify the potential problems that this new planet may face, as well as how you think this planet would fare in comparison to your current planet.

Twitter: @planetkibo
Instagram: planetkibo
Facebook : planetkibo
Whatsapp: …..